Reasons for the success of Sean's long thread:
1. Sean is empathic towards straight spouses. He acknowledges their pain. This makes him a great resource for traumatized newcomers, just trying to get their bearings.
2. Sean is self-deprecating and acknowledges the pain and suffering he caused his wife while he was married and GID. He and his ex have divorced and he has come to terms with his sexuality and is no longer in the closet. That is a significant point of contrast to those who continue to perpetuate a deceit.
3. Sean is patient and willing to answer the same questions over and over again. Many contributors come and go from SSN but Sean has staying power.
4. Sean has boundaries. He stays (more or less) on the subject matter and doesn't stray (except occasionally) from his narrow area of expertise. He encourages straight spouses to look after themselves but doesn't get enmeshed. Sean stays on his assigned thread and doesn't try to leave his mark everywhere. I respect this.
5. Sean can take a punch. A lot of people would have packed their bags and left when things got too uncomfortable but Sean takes his lumps when he gets called out and he moves on. I respect him for this. This is part of the reason why the thread is so long.
6. Sean's thread is so long that it implicitly carries "expert status" simply by virtue of its length. If I was a newcomer to the forum, it would be a first stop for me.
Would SSN be better without Sean's voice and his thread? Would straight spouses have more answers and more clarity if Sean was no longer a contributor? I think that the answer to both questions is a resounding: no.
For me, Sean's thread was like a piece of driftwood that floated by when I was at risk of drowning following my ship going down at sea. I didn't want to be flailing about in the water but my ship was gone and I was going to grab anything I could to try to get stabilized and get my bearings. This is why I think that Sean has particular resonance with newcomers to the forum.
The (un)intended consequence of this question (i.e. why is Sean afforded "saint status"?), in my opinion, is that it is an implicit criticism of those who find solace and comfort in Sean's words. What does the initial post that started this thread say about the many individuals who find Sean's words helpful? Is it supposed to undermine their confidence or imbue them with further self-doubt? If so, why? Everyone here is at a different stage of a painful journey. Let's allow people to find help where they can and not judge people for that. Let's welcome multiple voices, with different perspectives, in recognition of the fact that what helps one person may not help another.
Last edited by JenS (April 1, 2019 2:14 pm)