Offline
Though I have written about this before, I know in general it requires being a little more specific. So I tried to write about some thoughts I had.
The most critical part to a successful monogamous MOM is to fully accepting each other. This seems a simple and basic certainty. Often this is only interpreted as the task to accept the gay sexuality. But this is clearly not accepting each other, for it is limited to accepting one (gay) and not the other (straight).
Approaches I often encounter:
Gay spouse: If I choose a MOM then I miss that part of myself in my sexuality that I need to really be who I am. As a result, there always remains a no man's land, emptiness, an unfulfilled desire, and cannot fully give myself to my partner. Being intimate, answering to the sexual feelings of my partner feels so contradictory, because what I would like to feel and experience is not what I really am, desire or find myself in. It doesn't feel complete and not authentic. I feel like a lie to my partner. My sexuality and feeling are in that regard incompatible with my partner.
Straight spouse: When I choose a MOM I know in my heart that my partner longs for something else, something that I am not and can not give. In other words, I am not enough. I don't feel known in who I am. In fact… I feel rejected, unattractive and unloved.
At the same time, there is always that confrontation, as a conflict within myself, with a mire of thoughts that I am denying my partner something that he / she is entitled to and should actually experience in order to involve and get to who my partner is. Because that's who he/she is and can't help it. I am very sorry that I am not and cannot be this for my partner.
Both are empty-handed and in lack of who they both want to be.
Both are left with a desire that remains unfulfilled.
Often times this mutual shortage makes the irreconcilable barrier to be (really) intimate and to enjoy sexuality together.
How will this ever align with fully accepting each other?
Even for those around who aren’t in a MOM, it is a difficult dilemma. People who try to be supportive but never actually dealt with LGB feelings this close to home in any what so ever way but still have an opinion about homosexuality. They imagine a MOM does not have a solid ground for both, they assume it’s about denying ones feelings.
But what if… fully accepting each other in who you are actually means something different?
Something that goes beyond your own individual sense of deficiency, needs and desire in being and acceptance. In my opinion this acceptance can be divided in two different aspects which apply to both spouses equally:
Offline
Some time ago, we were asked to write an (initial version of) "a first aid kit" for the MOM section. I tried several times, but got stuck, The situations of MOM's are so diverse. Yes, there are common themes: Real acceptance (most important), openess and communication (also most important). Set your common goal and go for it as a team. Rebuilding trust and supporting each other as spouses. Finding the right kind of support (therapists that really align with the goal you both set). Choose your own way together, no matter what other people do or think.
But it feels too much like a clinical list, without the real life story where these aspects are applied and real people were going through these things. Next to that, it doesn't acknowledge the mere diversity of situations people could find themselves in.
When we were at the start of our journey, utterly confused and anxious, The most helpful to us would have been a possitive story of a couple that went in and through it. Yes, there will be differences in someones personal account of their path, and therefor some things will not be applicable. But there will certainly be several common features as well.
Next to that, it's hopeful just to read about other accounts than pain, missery and failure. Some marriages fail, but some succeed and bring about something better than it was before. So, the path is difficult but not doomed.
I think the "First aid kit" should be about stories of couples that made it. Let people, in very diverse situations and with their particular spouse, decide for themselves whether and how aspects of these stories could apply to them. Everyone has to puzzle their own (beautiful) picture they want to built with their spouse. It won't be the excact same picture as ours, but it's about fitting the pieces together and finding the image you both go for, that matters.
Having some examples, is a very important thing. That's "the first aid".
Offline
Dutchman wrote:
I
think the "First aid kit" should be about stories of couples that made it. ........]Having some examples, is a very important thing. That's "the first aid"
I disagree. Any First Aid Kit should be focused solely on the straightspouse not the straightspouse and the person who has totally upended the r'ship because that's like saying "yes it is going to be okay, you simply have to go through all "this"... the
discovery, anger, angst, confusion, sadness and finally acceptance..... before you get there. We do all that, go through some, most or all of that anyway and many couples don't make it so I think giving positive examples in the first instance gives an unrealistic view of their situation.
Elle
Offline
First of all, there are ample stories on this form/website that make very clear that it doesn't always work out. Chances are, rather the unrealistic picture that "all will fail" is what threatens the balance.
Next to that, the stories that decribe a path to success should also describe difficulties encountered, not just some sugarcoated journal. But I don't think that danger exists. Those that succeeded know very well the problems that had to be overcome and the dangers on that road. Actually it are these aspects that are very helpful, I think.
In our situation we started with a set of userful and sensible principles. But then we also encountered the troubles we experienced trying to follow these guideline. And this is an essential part of the storie as well.
Just a list of points, could unwillingly suggest it's like: "follow these steps, and then you'll find happyness".
But the more practical lived through description where choices and consequences are embedded, and how it worked in practise are much more helpfull.
Next to that, I hope it will also be more clear what a word means.For example something like "Acceptance", a very central and important concept. But what does someone think when they read this word, what is it's meaning? That could be quite different than what was intended by the writer. Embedding it in a story makes it much more clear what the intention and meaning is.
Offline
Dutchman wrote:
First of all, there are ample stories on this form/website that make very clear that it doesn't always work out........
I agree there are many accounts of r'ships not working out. But nowhere in the first aid kit does it say it won't. Nor does it say it will.
By it's very title First Aid Kit...it's the place that should be entirely focused on the straightspouse because that is who this website represents.
The MOM board started because as a straightspouse it was me who needed a place to discover where I belonged in the Mindfuck. Not my partner. Me.
Stories about success may be comforting to some but as a first encounter in the confusion and heartache of the earth tilt when your whole world is spinning.....the straightspouse needs facts, not fairytales.
''Happy ever after''s should be in the content of the board.....but should stay out of the introduction to it
Elle
Edited to say....to be clear I don't even believe this boards warrants a First Aid Kit. I think to do so would be a seperation of who we are as a Forum
Last edited by Ellexoh_nz (May 30, 2022 2:03 pm)
Offline
The persons who stay with a gay or lesbian deserve some respect. Not all of us could or would do that.
Offline
Thank you Gloria! It's important to note the plural "persons" in your post, for the will and effort has to come from both spouses, the straight and gay alike. Each with his/hers own set of problems and difficulties to overcome while going for the goal you've set together.
That said, when it's worked through and out, it becomes easy. So it's not a life long struggle (and if it still feels that way, one hasn't solved the key issues yet). I think you should come to a place where all is okay and settled, and both just enjoy each other and the relation you have together. (with the odd twist of the different sexual orientation that's there, but who cares...).
Well the usual issues that can arise in a relation will be there, but not things that has specificaly to do with being in a MOM. Moreover, because the way up there was that demanding, lessons are learned to communicate, express feelings and solve problems together.
It's not like we burried the topic or like it's a taboo. Quite the oposite, we regulary talk with each other about sexuality issues, how we think and feel personally, but also how it's handled in society.
Offline
who cares? it's innate to care! I know you are both invested in your religious beliefs but even so there must be a part of you that cares.
And anyway, staying together in marriage is not just about how sincere or willing the couple are - it's also about sexual relations and it's not just the sexual orientation that matters, it's also the sexual dynamic.
Based on the stories I read here the majority of gay in denial husbands are on the submissive end of the dynamic which is so not compatible with their straight wives. And tbh the stories that I have read from the women married to dominant gay in denial husbands sound pretty awful, like the men are emotionally disconnected and conducting a highly active sex life. And then there are the dominant lesbian in denial wives - there are men who suffer physical abuse from their wives as well as the assault on their masculinity.
It is only since divorce became more accessible that people have stopped having to stay in a MOM regardless - there must have been a lot of lifetime MOMs in past generations don't you think?
Offline
With "who cares..." I mean it's of no concern to us anymore, in other words: it has become like a non-issue in our relation.
Obviously when my wife discovered she was lesbian 17 years ago, this was quite different. It was a struggle while we sought our path through it. But I want to make clear that when it's really worked through (not superficial, or with loose ends) the "struggling" is over and something of the passed.
During the last 17 years, we sometimes came to a situation where we thought "okay, it's fairly good now, we can sustain it like this". Nevertheless, there were still important things lacking. But since we didn't know what the ultimate situation could/would be, we tried to be satisfied with it as good as we could.
Sooner or later the "symptom of struggle" would return, and that made clear we still had matters to solve. It's like the will is there, but emotions/feelings are telling us things aren't yet what it should be.
In a way feelings never lie, but also: feelings shouldn't be the base for choices. Our choices are determined by our will, and feelings are a result that function as an indicator how honest (to ourselves) our choices are.
So while we learned what our choices should be, positive feelings followed and acknowledged us. Sexuality is not different. That too was a consequence that changed and followed the choices we made.
It's not about wanting to change sexual orientation or somehow "choosing straight feelings". One can't choose feelings, like I said, feelings are a consequence, like a by-product that just happen.
The origin is choice, meaning: deciding and following up to what you really want, with whole heart and mind. Then later feelings will follow up and tell: "this is great!", happy feeling, fulfillment, connection. That is the experienced sexual dynamic.
Even when a concept like "Sexual orientation" also exists. For me as straight spouse as well, the fact I'm married and choose for one woman, doesn't mean I don't see the attractiveness of other women (I won't act on it, but that is something different).
But although all these attractive women exist, this doesn't diminish nor change my love and appreciation of my wife. For she is my choice, she is who I want.
I think this path is possible when people honestly wants to. When both spouses get it, and find their way together and towards each other. It results in the "gay + 1", so the sexual orientation maybe gay, but there is this "one special person of the opposite sex". And this one is all that it takes to have a MOM
Well, I know I am the "+1" but this doesn't feel wrong or wobbly. For we talked a lot and openly, there is solid trust between us (not just proven by words, but acts and general way of conduct as well). So yes, my wife is lesbian, but who cares? (I don't!)
One remark: the "open relation" solution is very different. For I don't think it results in the "+1" like I wrote above. Hopefully my description makes this clear or at least hints to that. For I think choosing for an open relation shuts the door to this way. Of course people should decide for themselves what they want, and there are several ways to implement a MOM. But the monogamous route is inherently different than open relation ways.
Then there are unhealthy Moms's, where denial, personality disorders, lying and cheating rule the day. Where it's probably best to divorce. However, it's often not immediately that clear if a relation is really unhealthy and beyond repair. People are not perfect, they make mistakes, even good people screw up sometimes. There is this intermediate situation where it has to become clear what it really is about.
Is it a no good person and it's better to divorce, or is it our western culture that sends people into troubles? Things like: follow your feelings and act on them, (ie. don't think about right or wrong and choices, just act on basic instincts). This is promoted as the highest good and being authentic, while it's just nonsense of course.
It's not only MOM's that get into that trouble, but straight marriages as well. (MOM's failure rate is high, but offset it with straight marriages failure rates). A lot of what we've gone through in our MOM is very much applicable to straight marriage.
Divorce is not a taboo or no-go to us (you reference us being religious, and is that what you think?). I do think a couple has to really do their utmost best and commit to save their marriage, otherwise vows are meaningless. But when it's clear one (or both) doesn't willingly want to continue the marriage, divorce is the way to go. In all that I wrote before, I hope it's clear that it's about choices, things you willingly choose for, because you want it. Maybe not feeling it at the moment, but that's different.
For us our faith is a base for inspiration to go for what's good and right, not a set of commandments one has to suffer through. We are and feel free, and it causes us to think about what we do best with this freedom we're in.
Offline
No I don't think it's that1 your religion makes divorce taboo, I think it changes the way you think in terms of life fulfilment - primarily, that's between you and God, right?
imo the sexual dynamic of dominant/submissive is as black and white as orientation. And it is equally fudged over, and denied and yet prevalent in society, well it's embarrassing, right? but look around you and you see the wildlife shows and they show all sorts of animals having sex and you can see the dynamic at play. Mr Stallion doesn't roll over and say do me to Mrs Mare, he will always rear. It is the same for us at heart though obviously we are more tricky and good at the playacting.
In sincerity the feelings associated with the dynamic are profound.
so now, imagine how big a difference it must be where it is happening with someone who is physically attracted to you.
and also, where that dynamic doesn't match - imagine what it is like where the stallion rears and the mare rears right back at him. or the lion crawls on his belly wanting the lioness to penetrate him.
imo, orientation is the base factor, and if the lion wants to crawl on his belly he is likely to be gay.
And my guess is that gay in denial is often an underlying factor in a lot of the behaviours that result in divorce for what appears to be a straight marriage.